John Paul
11-30-2004, 04:15 PM
Hello,
I have finished my first 2500 hands - below are the stats. Thanks to all the folks who have commented on hands I have posted earlier, what I am mostly hoping for here is to see if any stats seem out of whack as a way to guide me to hands I should be reviewing/posting. Disclaimer - I realize the the sample size is too small to make firm statements about the BB/100
Hands: 2570
VP$IP: 17.55%
VP$SB: 36.33%
Folded to blind steals: both 100%
Attempt to steal blinds: 20%
W$WSF: 29.75%
BB/100: +2.51
W to SD%: 39.25%
Won $ at SD: 46.03%
PF Raise: 6.89%
Aggression Factors:
Flop: 2.26
Turn: 1.85
River 1.69
Total 1.91
Based on some earlier posts, and bisonbison's post on rating players ("Some notes on notes") I realized that I was being too passive postflop and have been posting hands and working on that. As a result my aggression factor is up, I think I am playing better - but it is hard to tell with small samples.
I have finished my first 2500 hands - below are the stats. Thanks to all the folks who have commented on hands I have posted earlier, what I am mostly hoping for here is to see if any stats seem out of whack as a way to guide me to hands I should be reviewing/posting. Disclaimer - I realize the the sample size is too small to make firm statements about the BB/100
Hands: 2570
VP$IP: 17.55%
VP$SB: 36.33%
Folded to blind steals: both 100%
Attempt to steal blinds: 20%
W$WSF: 29.75%
BB/100: +2.51
W to SD%: 39.25%
Won $ at SD: 46.03%
PF Raise: 6.89%
Aggression Factors:
Flop: 2.26
Turn: 1.85
River 1.69
Total 1.91
Based on some earlier posts, and bisonbison's post on rating players ("Some notes on notes") I realized that I was being too passive postflop and have been posting hands and working on that. As a result my aggression factor is up, I think I am playing better - but it is hard to tell with small samples.