rgp vs 2+2 forum...

would you ,in general, agree rgp gives more input into tourney play than this forum...????just wondering...gl

...unless you want to know how to bitch and insult players to get to the final table...

I think for HE limit/NL 2+2 does much better then RGP for tourney questions. Although there are a lot of big names on RGP they tend not to respond to tourney questions.


I have found that for stud or omaha hi/low we tend not to have a lot of responses on 2+2.


Ken Poklitar

ohKanada@hotmail.com

rgp excells in B.S.

I find both forums useful. I would have thought that it was in the NON-tournament area that RGP was more competitive. In any case, I read selected threads and I can get both into my schedule most of the time. Of course, I like UseNet in general and saw RGP first, so it had an advantage in the beginning.


--

Will in New Haven

Having been a lurker and poster in RGP for years now I can tell you that BOTH are invaluable for tourney/strategy/ring game information and debate.


I have given David and Mason a LOT of flack in RGP for the "bad interface" and "pop-up ads" and the percieved censorship. Let me now thoughtfully reflect on those posts.


1.) The web-based forum (bbs) interface is slow and clumsy compared to usenet with any decent newsreader, but bearable.


2.) Chuck Weinstock informed me the other day that the pop-ups weren't here anymore. HOORAY!!!


3.) When I re-read all of the "censorship" posts about 2+2 on RGP I find myself re-thinking my position(s). While I am all for a free flow of ideas, at least one of the posters who has been "eliminated" from 2+2 is now using RGP to attack S&M&Z relentlessly. If he was doing that to me in MY forum, I would have acted likewise.


I will continue to be an "RGP'er" until there is no such group, or I go to the grave. I will also start spending more time here where the FLAMING is at a bare minimum.


Rick "DaVoice" Charles

rick@voiceofpoker.com