139 PP 20+2 NL SnG

[Zelcious]

I've played 139 Party 20+2 NL SnG. I usually 2-table.
Here are my stats:

place 1 count 27 procent 19.4%
place 2 count 19 procent 13.7%
place 3 count 8 procent 5.8%
place 4 count 17 procent 12.2%
place 5 count 17 procent 12.2%
place 6 count 20 procent 14.4%
place 7 count 14 procent 10.1%
place 8 count 11 procent 7.9%
place 9 count 5 procent 3.6%
place 10 count 1 procent 0.7%

games 139, winnings 1102$ ROI 36.0 ITM 38.8

They are decent but far from excellent. I know had some really bad swings and since it's quite limited sample maybe my true ROI is higher. Can you get any info from these stats on where my play might suffer ? What would you otherwise recommend to advance to a ROI of around 45% 2-tabling ?

[Zelcious]

What I'm especially interested in is if I have too many finnishes in 4-6 ?
My thoughts are the following:
I might be too aggressive shorthanded and that's why have many finnishes in 4-6 but when I do make ITM I usually have a pretty big stack and bully myself into first most of times. That could be the reason why my third place finnishes are so low in comparison to firsts.

[poboys]

[ QUOTE ]
I've played 139 Party 20+2 NL SnG. I usually 2-table.
Here are my stats:

games 139, winnings 1102$ ROI 36.0 ITM 38.8



[/ QUOTE ]

This question is asked over and over again--try searching this forum for tons of discussion over sample size, ROI, and ITM stats.

Short answer: while your sample size is small, a 36% ROI is very good/near the upper bounds of what some may describe as unsustainable (and others not), and ITM is slightly below the 40%+ ITM mark most people shoot for.

Also read some posts on the kinds of cold streaks good (and I am not including myself in this list) players go on. It's not uncommon to go 10+ games without an ITM finish.

Good luck, and hit the search feature hard!