05-15-2002, 09:44 AM
The hand shown below was recently played online (I have altered all identifying information). Even before this hand played out, it was apparent that Zippy was a full blown maniac and Anne was a junior maniac who was prone to making nearly hopeless bluff-raises (and reraises) on the expensive streets.
10/20 TexasHold'emTable
Seat 1: Bill
Seat 2: Pat
Seat 3: Zippy
Seat 4: Hero
Seat 5: Anne
Zippy posts small blind (.5)
Hero posts big blind (1)
** Dealing down cards **
Anne calls (1)
Bill calls (1)
Pat calls (1)
Zippy raises (1.5)
Hero calls (1)
Anne raises (2)
Bill calls (2)
Pat calls (2)
Zippy raises (2)
Hero calls (2)
Anne calls (1)
Bill calls (1)
Pat calls (1)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 7c, 2c, 4c ]
Zippy bets (1)
Hero ! raises (2)
Anne raises (3)
Bill folds.
Pat folds.
Zippy raises (3)
Hero calls (2)
Anne calls (1)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 5s ]
Zippy bets (2)
Hero raises (4)
Anne calls (4)
Zippy raises (4)
Hero raises (4)
Anne calls (4)
Zippy calls (2)
** Dealing River ** : [ Ts ]
Zippy bets (2)
Hero calls (2)
Anne raises (4)
Zippy raises (4)
Hero calls (4)
Anne calls (2)
** Summary **
Main Pot: $74 | Rake: $2
Board: [ 7c 2c 4c 5s Ts ]
Zippy lost $22 [ 4s Ah ] [ a pair of fours ]
Hero bet $22, collected $74, net +$52 [ 2d 4d ] [ two pairs, fours and twos ]
Anne lost $22 [ Kc Kh ] [ a pair of kings ]
So, what do you think of Hero's play?
In a game like this, I would employ my "PartyPooper" strategy, one element of which is tight and usually passive preflop play. Against such lunatics, however, I wonder how tight is too tight? If you were utg (2 off the button) in this game, which of the following hands would you muck: QJ, KT, KJ, AT, AJ, 98s, T8s, 33?
10/20 TexasHold'emTable
Seat 1: Bill
Seat 2: Pat
Seat 3: Zippy
Seat 4: Hero
Seat 5: Anne
Zippy posts small blind (.5)
Hero posts big blind (1)
** Dealing down cards **
Anne calls (1)
Bill calls (1)
Pat calls (1)
Zippy raises (1.5)
Hero calls (1)
Anne raises (2)
Bill calls (2)
Pat calls (2)
Zippy raises (2)
Hero calls (2)
Anne calls (1)
Bill calls (1)
Pat calls (1)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 7c, 2c, 4c ]
Zippy bets (1)
Hero ! raises (2)
Anne raises (3)
Bill folds.
Pat folds.
Zippy raises (3)
Hero calls (2)
Anne calls (1)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 5s ]
Zippy bets (2)
Hero raises (4)
Anne calls (4)
Zippy raises (4)
Hero raises (4)
Anne calls (4)
Zippy calls (2)
** Dealing River ** : [ Ts ]
Zippy bets (2)
Hero calls (2)
Anne raises (4)
Zippy raises (4)
Hero calls (4)
Anne calls (2)
** Summary **
Main Pot: $74 | Rake: $2
Board: [ 7c 2c 4c 5s Ts ]
Zippy lost $22 [ 4s Ah ] [ a pair of fours ]
Hero bet $22, collected $74, net +$52 [ 2d 4d ] [ two pairs, fours and twos ]
Anne lost $22 [ Kc Kh ] [ a pair of kings ]
So, what do you think of Hero's play?
In a game like this, I would employ my "PartyPooper" strategy, one element of which is tight and usually passive preflop play. Against such lunatics, however, I wonder how tight is too tight? If you were utg (2 off the button) in this game, which of the following hands would you muck: QJ, KT, KJ, AT, AJ, 98s, T8s, 33?