11-28-2001, 11:46 AM
I was recently thinking about this play, which essentially is raising to get it heads up with an A high threeflush so that if you pair up you have a better chance of winning.
As I moved up in stakes I found that this play was much riskier. While it is easier to get it heads up, frequently you are heads up against a player with a good hand which either improves or is just better than yours. For example, I recently played such a hand where my heas up opponent called with buried 9's and ended up beating my pair of A's with two pair. I find that this happens more frequently.
At lower limits the raise was good not because it would be heads up but because it would build a bigger pot. This is not the case at higher limits.
Has anyone else had a similar experience with these hands, and if so what adjustments should be made? Or is this just a high deviance hand that will win in the long run but will often lose in teh short run, perhaps a majority of the time it is played.
All comments are welcome.
Pat
As I moved up in stakes I found that this play was much riskier. While it is easier to get it heads up, frequently you are heads up against a player with a good hand which either improves or is just better than yours. For example, I recently played such a hand where my heas up opponent called with buried 9's and ended up beating my pair of A's with two pair. I find that this happens more frequently.
At lower limits the raise was good not because it would be heads up but because it would build a bigger pot. This is not the case at higher limits.
Has anyone else had a similar experience with these hands, and if so what adjustments should be made? Or is this just a high deviance hand that will win in the long run but will often lose in teh short run, perhaps a majority of the time it is played.
All comments are welcome.
Pat