PDA

View Full Version : 66, 3 flush board


Firefly
11-01-2004, 07:01 PM
Any comments apreciated, I will give some commentary
Ultimate Bet 0.50/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, CO folds, Button folds, SB completes, Hero checks.

Standard
Flop: (3 SB) 4/images/graemlins/club.gif, 8/images/graemlins/club.gif, A/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="blue">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks.

I actually had check/fold selected
Turn: (1.50 BB) 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="blue">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, SB calls.

I'm pretty sure it's correct to but out here
River: (5.50 BB) T/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="blue">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="CC3333">UTG raises</font>, UTG+1 folds, SB folds, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 9.50 BB

I was fairly sure he had the flush, Could I safely fold here?

Entity
11-01-2004, 07:04 PM
I don't fold this river; in fact, I 3-bet it. I don't know why you'd assume he has the flush all of a sudden.

Rob

afk
11-01-2004, 07:07 PM
Folding the river brings sad feelings to my heart. I think I'd rather 3bet.

Firefly
11-01-2004, 07:08 PM
If that was party, that might have been my play. UTG hadn't done anything particularly unusual, and like most UB limit players he tends to be fairly solid. Interesting advice though. I shall keep it in mind.

Firefly
11-01-2004, 07:09 PM
Obviously I am wrong /images/graemlins/tongue.gif.

Thanks all, I will keep this one in mind.

John Paul
11-01-2004, 07:10 PM
I don't think I would be bold enough to 3-bet, but I wouldn't fold. My guess on hands for UTG would be Ax or TT, but not a flush. UTG just has not shown much agression before the river, so I would not credit him with a flush. But I am guessing from the way your post is written that UTG did have a flush.

Entity
11-01-2004, 07:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
If that was party, that might have been my play. UTG hadn't done anything particularly unusual, and like most UB limit players he tends to be fairly solid. Interesting advice though. I shall keep it in mind.

[/ QUOTE ]
If he's solid, he isn't checking a flush, then check/calling a flush, then check/raising a flush. That's simply not solid play; it's terrible play.

Rob

mmbt0ne
11-01-2004, 07:23 PM
He doesn't have TT either. It's almost impossible to put him on TT since he didn't raise the turn when another undercard fell after no one bet the A. Villian could very easily have KT, or some kind of T, but not trips. It's also possible he has 2 trashy pair if he's loose, or, as Entity said, the horribly played flush, but I don't see you losing to a higher set.

Greg J
11-01-2004, 07:28 PM
If UTG has a flush he played it horribly. I 3 bet this river.