JaBlue
10-31-2004, 02:51 AM
Hi this is about playing for set value.
The 5-10 rule states that if it is only 10% of your stack, it is worthwhile to play for set value; that is, to play no set, no bet style poker. (Lets assume you have pocket twos so that the situation with all unders doesn't occur)
If you call off 10% of your stack preflop with the ducks, your implied odds to hit the set are 10-1 (plus blinds). If you had 100, you're putting in 10 to possibly win 90 of your stack and their 10$ bet. Now lets add the blinds. If you assume that he's making a standard raise to 10 with you having to call 10, so blinds are 1.67 - 3.33 (since the standard 3x BB) . That adds an extra 5.00 to your implied odds if you assume the blinds won't call the vast majority of the time for a final implied odds of 5 (blinds) + 10 (his bet) + 90 (your stack after calling his blind and raise) = 115$
If you assume you have to fold when the set doesn't come 88% of the time, you lose your 10$ 88 times. For -880$. That means that for the 12 times you hit your set, you have to be able to extract 880$ more from your opponent each time in order to break even with this play. With implied odds of 105, which means they have to stack you, they have to double you up 8.3 times out of the 12 that you hit your set. Now, call me crazy, but I don't think that it's likely they'll pay you off this often.
This makes it clearly incorrect to call off 10% of your stack for set value heads up.
Obviously as more people enter the pot, your implied odds go way up along with the frequency that you'll be paid off, making it much more correct to call 10% of your stack with limpers in front etc.
Anyway I really just posted this to show the people that love systems where they can follow precise rules and profit in this game that the 5-10 rule is not always correct.
Obviously, if you have a situation with others in the pot and it is 10% or less of your stack to call, its a good idea to do so.
Anyway discuss the validity of this post /images/graemlins/smile.gif
-Jared
The 5-10 rule states that if it is only 10% of your stack, it is worthwhile to play for set value; that is, to play no set, no bet style poker. (Lets assume you have pocket twos so that the situation with all unders doesn't occur)
If you call off 10% of your stack preflop with the ducks, your implied odds to hit the set are 10-1 (plus blinds). If you had 100, you're putting in 10 to possibly win 90 of your stack and their 10$ bet. Now lets add the blinds. If you assume that he's making a standard raise to 10 with you having to call 10, so blinds are 1.67 - 3.33 (since the standard 3x BB) . That adds an extra 5.00 to your implied odds if you assume the blinds won't call the vast majority of the time for a final implied odds of 5 (blinds) + 10 (his bet) + 90 (your stack after calling his blind and raise) = 115$
If you assume you have to fold when the set doesn't come 88% of the time, you lose your 10$ 88 times. For -880$. That means that for the 12 times you hit your set, you have to be able to extract 880$ more from your opponent each time in order to break even with this play. With implied odds of 105, which means they have to stack you, they have to double you up 8.3 times out of the 12 that you hit your set. Now, call me crazy, but I don't think that it's likely they'll pay you off this often.
This makes it clearly incorrect to call off 10% of your stack for set value heads up.
Obviously as more people enter the pot, your implied odds go way up along with the frequency that you'll be paid off, making it much more correct to call 10% of your stack with limpers in front etc.
Anyway I really just posted this to show the people that love systems where they can follow precise rules and profit in this game that the 5-10 rule is not always correct.
Obviously, if you have a situation with others in the pot and it is 10% or less of your stack to call, its a good idea to do so.
Anyway discuss the validity of this post /images/graemlins/smile.gif
-Jared