PDA

View Full Version : Bad time for a slow play?


Bigwig
10-29-2004, 02:29 PM
Pokerstars $11 + rebuys.

BB is 600.

Hero UTG+2 (t7500)
Villain CO (t24000)

Hero is dealt A /images/graemlins/spade.gifA /images/graemlins/club.gif
All fold to Hero.
Hero raises to 2200.
All fold to Villain who calls.

Flop: A /images/graemlins/diamond.gifK /images/graemlins/heart.gif6 /images/graemlins/heart.gif

Hero checks.
Villain checks.

Turn: Q /images/graemlins/club.gif

Hero bets 2400.
Villain reraises to all-in.
Hero calls.

I lost. He made the A high straight.

Now, this is not generally a scary straight board, correct? But there was a straight draw and a flush draw. Despite having an apparent lock, can I afford to slowplay this? My thought was to appear afraid of the big cards, and hope the Villain makes a play at the pot. But, with such a short stack, was this a mistake?

Thanks for your feedback.

adanthar
10-29-2004, 02:52 PM
There's 5K in the pot and you have 5K behind. A flush draw already (marginally) has the odds to call an all in on the flop. All other hands are drawing to at most 4 outs and more likely something like .5. Okay, once in a while the board winds up with four hearts; whatever.

You have to slowplay this. Ni han, next tourney.

remen
10-29-2004, 03:13 PM
What was your read on your opponent? Unless he has been playing very loose and not paying much attention to other people, I don't like the slowplay here. I am assuming you have been playing TAG throughout the tournament. Any decent player would probably think that a raise from a TAG shortstacked UTG+2 probably meant a pretty good hand. That flop definetly looks like it hit your hand pretty well, and he very well may have thought you were trying to slowplay something.

Giving him free cards isn't going to let him make a hand that pays you off. He is either going to make a hand that beats you or one that folds to a big bet from you. Unless he is a LAG, I don't think it is likely for him to try to bully you out of the pot. I think you are just giving free cards to draws that could beat you. I think you should push at this flop and take down a nice sized pot.

Bigwig
10-29-2004, 03:24 PM
[ QUOTE ]
What was your read on your opponent? Unless he has been playing very loose and not paying much attention to other people, I don't like the slowplay here. I am assuming you have been playing TAG throughout the tournament. Any decent player would probably think that a raise from a TAG shortstacked UTG+2 probably meant a pretty good hand. That flop definetly looks like it hit your hand pretty well, and he very well may have thought you were trying to slowplay something.

Giving him free cards isn't going to let him make a hand that pays you off. He is either going to make a hand that beats you or one that folds to a big bet from you. Unless he is a LAG, I don't think it is likely for him to try to bully you out of the pot. I think you are just giving free cards to draws that could beat you. I think you should push at this flop and take down a nice sized pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, it was my 3rd or 4th hand at the table as I had just been moved. So, I had no reads. And yes, I'm very TAG. I was hoping that he would catch two pair or had an A, and made a play at the pot.

KKsuited
10-29-2004, 03:31 PM
Well for my 2 cents, I very rarely slow play any hand. I made this adjustment after 1) reading Supersystem 2) watching Gus Hansen play.

But, if you want to slowplay a hand, this is not the one to do it with. The smooth call of 1/3 of your chips should have signaled to the other guy that you probably had a hand that was going to be difficult to get you off of. If someone smooth calls 1/3 chips, I have to put them on AA,KK,AK, maybe QQ.

Like the previous poster said, the guy is only going to put chips in the pot if you're beat (if he's a good player, which we will assume).

With a straight and flush draw, I think this was a really bad time to slowplay.

I'd consider looking into the thoery of not slowplaying at all. I only slowplay when I flop a fullhouse or something similar. It's really helped my game.

I'll probably get flamed knowing how much so many people love to check raise and slowplay. I rarely do either.

Rakkad
10-29-2004, 03:31 PM
I push here. Giving a free card on this drawing board is only going to hurt you.

You have about about 5300 left, with 5k in the pot, you want to win it right now.

napawino
10-29-2004, 03:59 PM
(As others have written, including Sklansky & Malmuth), the necessary conditions to slowplay are BOTH:
1) A very good hand – likely to hold up as a winner
2) Likelyhood of another player making a 2nd best hand on future streets

These must also be weighed against the likelihood that the person who might be drawing might pay you off right now anyway. (Obviously there are some people that will pay you off with just a few outs, so there’s never a need to slowplay them.)

I’m not a big fan of the slow-play, but I think it’s reasonable to think that these conditions might have been met here considering the pre-flop raise & the board, so I’m not too critical of the slow-play. The thing you have to realize is that slow-playing – while sometimes very lucrative – generally increases your variance. Variance increases are generally not something I look for in tournaments.

Getting back to the specifics, I can’t come up with many hands that I would think would be dangerous here if you gave them a free card. The fact that this person played JT obviously opens up the possibilities a little more, so the list might include:
JT, QhJh, AhQh, AhJh, AhTh. Ah xh is possible depending on the player.

The list of hands that could improve but still be beat would include:
KQ, QQ, JJ, TT, any pocket pair (that they would have played for a raise)

The list of hands that would probably pay you off NOW includes:
KK, AK, 66, A6 (maybe)

After looking over this list, I think your slowplay wasn’t a bad play – but you’ve got to be willing to accept the variance IMHO.

willie
10-29-2004, 04:02 PM
i agree that you have to slowplay this hand, you're headsup- and you need to let the opponent make a second best hand- it's just poor luck that he turned the nuts on you, but even then you had outs to pair the board or case on the river-

nothing wrong with this play headsup i don't think.

woodguy
10-29-2004, 04:04 PM
I have a personal dislike for slowplaying anything unless I flop quads, or a very unobvious straight on a rainbow board.
That being said, I'd probably bet the straight to build the pot, whereas if I have the deck emptied with my quads I'll lay low.

I am of the opinion that when you slow play you give away the strength of your hand when you "wake up" on a later street and you scare your opponent away. (this is not always true, but mostly true)

With strong hands I prefer to build a pot from the flop on, so that my opponent feels tied to the pot and will call down to the end, or entice them to come over top of me on a later street.

In this case the pot is 5000, you have 5000. You can either bet it all now, or make a weak bet hoping he comes over top.

IMO the pot is big enough on the flop to want it now and you push.

Checking just allows him to improve for free and this is a dangerous board and while you have a great hand, its not the nuts and many cards are scare cards here, and you are going to get your chips in there anyhow.

A good rule of thumb is any two broadway cards on board gives a straight draw to your opponent (some go down to the 9 with this rule) and of course any two suited gives a flush draw.

On this board you have both draws and givien the pot size and your stack size, you have 1 bet to make.

All that being said, he probably calls and sucks out on you, but at least you don't feel dumb afterwards. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Regards,
Woodguy

gergery
10-29-2004, 04:12 PM
Bad spot to slowplay, I think.

Slowplaying is good when your opponent will improve to a 2nd best hand but not a better hand, or he’s likely to bluff. But here the only reasonable 2nd best hand would be if a pair hits a set (pretty unlikely), but its much more likely a gutshot or flush will hit. And bluffing is unlikely as there are both an A and K on the board in a hand where in EP player raised (and so is likely to have hit), so this is not a board many LPs will bluff at.

--Greg

adanthar
10-29-2004, 04:18 PM
Ahxh will call an all in on the flop, turn, turn.5, if you flash an ace, whenever. A big stack coldcalling QhJh on Party isn't folding this, either, though he may go all in when checked to on the flop (great!)

There's a lot of talk here about giving 'free cards' but this is not a hand where that applies. Giving a freebie will not alter the eventual outcome of the hand one iota unless he has EXACTLY one of three possible combos (QJ, QT, JT) and even then they can't both be hearts or they call anyway.

davidross
10-29-2004, 04:21 PM
Its a perfect spot for a slowplay, You're not folding no matter what, and you're much more likely to get some kind of action if you let him have one more card to hit his hand. I might have even checked the turn.

Bad luck.

davidross
10-29-2004, 04:26 PM
I don't think there is anything wrong with never slowplaying, so I won't disagree with you, but there are plenty of players who will make a play at this pot when they have the other player covered like this. Any pair QQ and down is terrified of that flop, and lots of players will make a play at it.

gergery
10-29-2004, 04:32 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think there is anything wrong with never slowplaying, so I won't disagree with you, but there are plenty of players who will make a play at this pot when they have the other player covered like this. Any pair QQ and down is terrified of that flop, and lots of players will make a play at it.

[/ QUOTE ]

If they'd make a play at it, then they'd also make a play if you bet out small at it. and that builds a pot better, yes?

Maybe its not a terrible spot for a slowplay, but i'd think raising is better.

Chief911
10-29-2004, 05:21 PM
I'll disagree with a few people who say to slowplay.

This is an AWFUL time to slowplay. You just hit trips, and have 1/3 of your stack invested.

While you might extract more chips by giving a free card, you also set yourself up.

I would list one of the biggest keys to any success I've had in the last two months with MTT's is not slowplaying hands that I'm most likely not willing to let go. Hands I will gladly slowplay are Boats, Flushes, and Quads (duh). Slowplying trips on a flush/straight board was a HUGE mistake. You already got some value out of your hand, and might get more if you push the flop (Especially if he has a nice fat hand like AK, or such).

You absolutely cannot give out a free card here, unless you want to have to fold to an allin bet if Q, J, T, or heart hits. Get your value from the chips in the pot, and someone possibly making a stupid call with a 2nd best or drawing hand.

Punch that pot postflop by going all in. Believe in the cow.

http://www.bettheriver.com/image/pushit.jpg

davidross
10-29-2004, 05:26 PM
He never had a chance to raise. He's acting first. He checked the flop and bet the turn.

davidross
10-29-2004, 05:30 PM
Pushing on the flop here probably wins what's already in there 98% of the time with no call. We are playing this hand to the end no matter what, we have the nuts, and if we get drawn out on we still have outs to the nuts. I think we're being a little over cautious here.

remen
10-29-2004, 06:34 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Its a perfect spot for a slowplay, You're not folding no matter what, and you're much more likely to get some kind of action if you let him have one more card to hit his hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

What hand could he hit that doesn't beat the trip aces, but stills pays off the trips? Maybe he could hit a lower set, but I can't really think of anything else. There is a much better chance of the turn/river bringing a card that gives your opponent the best hand (completing a broadway straight or a flush) than the turn/river giving your opponent the second best hand. I think the pot is big enough already on the flop that pushing is right.

KKsuited
10-29-2004, 07:00 PM
I have to disagree with you David. This looks to me like an obvious spot to never slow play. What hands can be hit that don't beat you? Not many. Forget the fact you have trip aces, they're no good against the hands that are probably being drawn for. You also have to consider a slow play not only costs you the pot, but the tournament as well.

I wouldn't ever agree with this play, but if the guy wasn't covered it may help.

davidross
10-29-2004, 07:34 PM
I wasn't thinking of it in terms of him making a 2nd best hand, but rather giving the big stack a chance to play bully. I have more outs to the full house than anyone does of hitting their gutshot, and I'll have more outs again on the river than someone chasing a flush. I'm never putting the guy on JT, I'm thinking more in terms of a pair JJ down. I just believe this is a case where I think my hand is worth more than is just in the pot already, and my chances of getting more by checking are higher than my chances of losing the pot by checking.

I'm certainly not criticising anyone who bets here, but I would check that flop 100% of the time. But I also check top pair a lot in NL tournaments. I'm pretty sure this is part of the reason I keep going 20 or 30 tournaments without cashing, but also probably explains why I seem to make high finishes when I do cash. I seem to be quite (too?) willing to take risks in these situations.

AlwaysWrong
10-30-2004, 02:05 AM
I agree in general with David here, I think going for slowplay here SHOULD work fine. It's hard to see a player cold-calling a 3.5x the bb pf raise and then only planning on putting more chips in the pot if they hit. I believe that if your opponent had any other hand than a gs straight draw he would have bet at this pot. Open-ended, top pair, complete miss, he would have bet, and you would have had him in oodles of trouble.

You pretty much ran into the only flop where your play doesn't work out, and then the only turn where you really pay for it. Tough luck.

Given the quite loose nature of your opponent, though, I can see making a weak lead at this pot, and hoping they make a move overtop. If they don't you can check the turn, hoping that they read it as, "I had to take a stab on the flop, but I have nothing."

JaBlue
10-30-2004, 03:25 AM
With your two aces you make the deck pretty dead... The question is, what hand is he going to pay you off that doesn't beat you? Are you just praying that he has an underpair and will catch his trips on the turn or river?

You gotta bet out. You don't let underpairs catch trips often enough to make a check here correct - any hand that's going to pay you off has you beat (assuming you check flop and a scary card comes). Anyway, I say you bet out here.

Would you check here if you had 66? Please tell me you wouldn't unless you had a hyper-aggressive opponent.

-Jared

ThingDo
10-30-2004, 04:26 AM
"and my chances of getting more by checking are higher than my chances of losing the pot by checking."

Davidross said this and I think this is the biggest issue here. Everyone has been saying what hands will pay you off that don't have you beat? QUITE a few hands will pay you off if you check this flop and its checked behind other than just hands that have you beat. I agree w/ the slowplay here. The fact of the matter is, his opp. in this hand will bet a very wide range of his hands on the turn and bet enough that he'll have to call with the same range of them.