PDA

View Full Version : Did I miss out on a huge pot...


06-12-2002, 05:09 PM
I'm a relatively new low limit player (profitable about 70% of the time on $1-5 stud tables). Was at the Taj Sunday night with 1 shark, 1 rock, a new player (who appeared strong), and 2 very loose passive players.


I'm dealt trip 5's first three cards. Player to my left (LP widow) brings it in for $1, rock calls, new player raised to $5 with Ace on the board, shark calls, LP#2 calls. Don't know the board exactly but all the A's and all the 5's were still live. I typically slowplay in this situation but all the action coupled with my table image (had a couple high exposure bluffs) compelled me to raise to $10. Every player folds and I take a paltry $17 pot.


Looking back I think this was an awful move. The new guy did fold a pair of A's. How much of an advantage do I have against the A's and several good drawing hands? If I held out and filled or pulled quad 5's, I think the pot would have been huge (by $1-5 standards) as the LP's twice that night raised on the river with flushes against obvious full houses. Is this an automatic slowplay?

06-12-2002, 06:05 PM
I think you made the correct play since a few players had already put $5 into the pot.


No hand is a lock. Just yesterday, I was dealt (5,5)5 in a 10-20 and re-raised and Ace doorcard. The hand became heads-up and I got drawn out on.


Remember, it is correct to play a hand correctly and still lose or hurt your earn. It's also possible to play a hand incorrectly and still win or increase your earn.

06-13-2002, 02:51 AM
try NOT to play at the same table with the "new player" anymore.


Sitting Bull

06-13-2002, 04:33 AM
I think your play is right. There's already money in the pot and since several players have already put in $5, there is no reason to believe they won't put in another $5. I also find it hard to believe that someone threw away a pair of aces. (Of course he might have told you he did.)

06-13-2002, 04:48 AM
You played the hand right and you may want to take advantage of this 'respect' they're giving you on future hands.

Do you know what I mean?

06-13-2002, 10:06 AM
As a low limit stud player myself, I had a similar situation recently in a $1-3 game in CT. I had rolled kings, called the bring in and had a $3 raise from a decent player and a call from a loose player behind me. Bring in folded and I re-raised, figuring they'd put me on a pair of kings and call

(neither had an ace showing). But both folded. This was early in my sit, and I later realized the decent player would often raise with mid pairs and slow play big ones. She probably folded a pair of 8s or something. The loose player called almost everything, so I probably just caught him with absolute crap. With trip kings, I obviously made a big mistake here. With trip fives, I wouldn't be feeling too bad about your play as it's pretty easy to lose with this hand. Although I do agree that it's probably better to play trappy and hope to make something big while they make something smaller.


Also, in this same session, I folded aces with both other aces live, against a super rock who was the bring in with a deuce, paired deuces on fourth street and bet out. He almost had to have trips

there (although pocket kings and maybe queens were a possibility). The pot was tiny, I was either losing a little or losing badly. He got no customers and flipped up his third deuce in frustration.

06-13-2002, 01:01 PM
in mucking your A's when a tight player re-raised. Even if U had live A's,your best play at this point in a low limit game is to muck.

***

However,U definitely should wait until 5th Srt. to raise any set higher than 9's(Roy West).

Sets of T's and over are not as vulnerable to over-sets.

Happy pokering,

sitting Bull

06-13-2002, 01:17 PM
player re-raised my A's,I would not have any problem mucking them. The reason for this is based on the premise that at sturcture games 10-20 and lower,players USUALLY have what they represent(Roy West).

Hence,the assumption that the A's are beat is a valid one--especially since he was "telling" the other players that he had "A's".

Hence,he reasoned that since Mac re-raised with a "5", he must have A's beat.

********

Of course,in higher limit games like 15-30 and over,the probability of split A's is not quite as high--so if I have 2nd top pair ,I would re-raise A's on a random basis in a 15-30 and higher limit game and "pray to the poker gods" that my opponent did NOT really have the A's when choosing a random spot to re-raise.

If he did,I would just have to go home crying.

Happy pokering,

Sitting Bull

06-13-2002, 02:59 PM

06-13-2002, 05:32 PM
"Of course,in higher limit games like 15-30 and over,the probability of split A's is not quite as high--so if I have 2nd top pair ,I would re-raise A's on a random basis in a 15-30 and higher limit game and "pray to the poker gods" that my opponent did NOT really have the A's when choosing a random spot to re-raise.

If he did,I would just have to go home crying. "


You would raise an Ace door card with 2 limpers and 2 more that called the raise in a 15-30 game? Have you done this before? How did it work out?


-KeithO

06-13-2002, 08:15 PM
Because you would do it, and perhaps because it actually is the right play, doesn't mean that the typical low limit player would do it. I think it would be a rare exception for someone to fold aces.

06-13-2002, 09:23 PM
Mac,


With money in the pot in a $1-5 game I would have done the same thing with rolled up 8's or under.I can't tell you how many times I haven't and regretted it.WTG

06-15-2002, 03:45 AM

06-15-2002, 03:47 AM

06-15-2002, 03:54 AM
never seen anyone folding A's in my 1/5 game before.

However,I did see many lose 4 to 5 BB's when they show down A's up and their opponent takes it down with rolled-up babies.


Happy pokering,

Sitting Bull