justified aggression?

[georgesimpson]

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (9 handed)

Preflop: Hero is Button with K/images/graemlins/heart.gif, Q/images/graemlins/club.gif.
UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 calls, CO folds, Hero calls, SB folds, BB checks.

Flop: (3.50 SB) T/images/graemlins/heart.gif, 8/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 4/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, MP3 folds, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

Turn: (2.75 BB) 4/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

River: (4.75 BB) 5/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

Final Pot: 6.75 BB
<font color="green">Main Pot: 6.75 BB, between Hero and BB.</font>

it was BB, he checked, I assumed I had two higher overcards with nothing on the board after the flop.

[Sent]

I raise this PF, and after he calls the turn I just check the river, he wont call you with anything you can beat and KQ has no showdown value. A2o beats you.

-Sent

[bergh]

BB could have anything (besides parhaps pocket aces). Most of it probably beats you... :-)

Why not raise PF to take blinds and isolate the (probably weak) limper?