PT Stat: Folded to River Bet (my leak) CP

[Ralph Wiggum]

I'm in search on my biggest leak. I think I've found it. I want to ask you guys, what is your Folded To River Bet percentage (mine's 49%)? Also, how many hands have you played and at what limit? I'm a 2/4 guy.

Edit: Crossposted, I guess we're posting PT stuff in this forum.

[newjade]

I'm just a lurker, but for what its worth, since I bough PT I've played 29,062 hands at 5/10. My bb/100hands is over 1.5/100hands. Nothing great, but its in the black.

My Folded to a River bet is 34.47%.

[uuDevil]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm in search on my biggest leak. I think I've found it. I want to ask you guys, what is your Folded To River Bet percentage (mine's 49%)?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that number necessarily represents a leak. See
this thread. (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=990711&page=&view=&sb =5&o=&vc=1)

[mistrpug]

Well, if you think you might be folding too much, you may want to read this Ed Miller post (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=462860&page=&view=&sb =5&o=&vc=1).

[theghost]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm in search on my biggest leak. I think I've found it. I want to ask you guys, what is your Folded To River Bet percentage (mine's 49%)?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that number necessarily represents a leak. See
this thread. (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=990711&page=&view=&sb =5&o=&vc=1)

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to highlight Chesspain's post from that thread on interpreting this stat:
[ QUOTE ]
"Remember that this Pokertracker stat is called "Folded to a river bet." Although I have folded to a river bet 117 out 232 times (50%), I have seen approx. 900 rivers, and have bet 33% of the time and have raised another 5% of the time. I call 17% of the time, check 30%, and fold 15%. Therefore, I'm only folding 15% of all of the rivers I've seen.

In fact, my PT aggression factor for all river play is 2.15, whereas the program suggests that a factor on any street above 1.5 is "aggressive."

[/ QUOTE ]

So a high number isn't necessarily a weak/tight leak.

[Lost Wages]

So a high number isn't necessarily a weak/tight leak.

Correct. Link. (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1124403&page=0&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14&vc=1)

Lost Wages