KenProspero
10-06-2004, 02:36 PM
Ok, I'm a relative newbie, so this may just be me.
In resonding to a post, a few minutes ago, I commented, briefly that I'm not overwhelmed with the analysis feature of Wilsons TTH.
While their system may (or may not) be one to make money, there are areas where I think they're wrong. (example, several times I've been told that calling KJs in early position is a loose call.) If memory serves, this is counter to Ed Miller's advice (in loose or tight games). In big blind they recommend calling some raised hands that I don't even think are close (this may be me, but I just don't think the odds are there for some of their calls).
In their "challenge" play, beat their play say 75% to 80% of the time, so I think my play is ok, relative to the algorithm (though I haven't played enough games to say that this is statistically valid yet).
In any event, I'd love to hear other's comments/experience with this aspect of the game.
In resonding to a post, a few minutes ago, I commented, briefly that I'm not overwhelmed with the analysis feature of Wilsons TTH.
While their system may (or may not) be one to make money, there are areas where I think they're wrong. (example, several times I've been told that calling KJs in early position is a loose call.) If memory serves, this is counter to Ed Miller's advice (in loose or tight games). In big blind they recommend calling some raised hands that I don't even think are close (this may be me, but I just don't think the odds are there for some of their calls).
In their "challenge" play, beat their play say 75% to 80% of the time, so I think my play is ok, relative to the algorithm (though I haven't played enough games to say that this is statistically valid yet).
In any event, I'd love to hear other's comments/experience with this aspect of the game.