dgoldsmith
10-01-2004, 01:03 PM
From page 18:
"To a large degree, all hands in a particular group should be played the same way before the flop. Thus, if in a certain situation it is correct to raise with AQ, it is correct to raise with KQ suited. If it is correct to fold two eights 'wired', it is correct to fold AJ offsuit."
In the case of the second example, both 88 and AJo are in Group 4.
However, in the first example, AQ is in Group 3 while KQs is in Group 2. I'm trying to figure out if this is a typo and they meant to compare AQ suited to KQs (both are Group 2 hands) or if they were trying to make the point that if it is worth raising with lower Groups, it is also worth raising with higher Groups (seems like this would be obvious).
If there is a URL/site somewhere with known errata for 2+2 books, please let me know.
Dave
"To a large degree, all hands in a particular group should be played the same way before the flop. Thus, if in a certain situation it is correct to raise with AQ, it is correct to raise with KQ suited. If it is correct to fold two eights 'wired', it is correct to fold AJ offsuit."
In the case of the second example, both 88 and AJo are in Group 4.
However, in the first example, AQ is in Group 3 while KQs is in Group 2. I'm trying to figure out if this is a typo and they meant to compare AQ suited to KQs (both are Group 2 hands) or if they were trying to make the point that if it is worth raising with lower Groups, it is also worth raising with higher Groups (seems like this would be obvious).
If there is a URL/site somewhere with known errata for 2+2 books, please let me know.
Dave