Was this too aggressive?

[shawn_p]

No reads on players 2nd orbit at table.

PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (10 handed)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with K/images/graemlins/heart.gif, A/images/graemlins/spade.gif.
<font color="CC3333">UTG raises</font>, <font color="CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, UTG+2 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, CO folds, Button folds, SB folds, BB folds, UTG calls.

Flop: (7.50 SB) 8/images/graemlins/club.gif, 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
UTG checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="CC3333">UTG raises</font>, <font color="CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, UTG calls.

Turn: (6.75 BB) 5/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
UTG checks, Hero checks.

River: (6.75 BB) Q/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
UTG checks, Hero checks.

Final Pot: 6.75 BB

[jluker7]

I think so, with no reads on the player, im putting him on middle poket pair. That is exactly how I would play 99 or TT. You slowed him down enough to get a free showdown, and now you have your read..

But I think 3 betting on flop is pretty aggresive. If he bets into you on turn, are you calling?

[eric5148]

I would have called the flop raise. You checked behind on the turn and he checks to you on the river? That might signal no pair.