08-12-2002, 01:43 PM
I was thinking a bit today about poker and winning and losing.
Let's say there is a small card room with on average 5-6 games going.
The people playing in these games mirror the general poker population. Most are losers, a few are break even, and a smaller few are actually winning.
Except for the few that are winning, the rest are passing money around between each other with the house draining some off in the rake.
Now let's say that you add into this mix 1 or 2 more winning players. What, if any macro effects on the long term state of the game are there?
In larger casinos with many tables and games it seems that adding a winner or two wouldn't effect the game that much. But in a smaller environment as I described, are there any perceivable changes?
Let's say there is a small card room with on average 5-6 games going.
The people playing in these games mirror the general poker population. Most are losers, a few are break even, and a smaller few are actually winning.
Except for the few that are winning, the rest are passing money around between each other with the house draining some off in the rake.
Now let's say that you add into this mix 1 or 2 more winning players. What, if any macro effects on the long term state of the game are there?
In larger casinos with many tables and games it seems that adding a winner or two wouldn't effect the game that much. But in a smaller environment as I described, are there any perceivable changes?