rjamesd
09-13-2004, 11:32 AM
A situation came up recently while I was playing limit hold 'em at my local card room. There was a misdeal and the floorman made a determination that I don't understand. I'm looking for a real rock-solid "official" opinion and hoping you can help me.
For simplicity I will describe what happened as if seat 1 had the button. There were three players left (Seat 2, 5, and 8) and the dealer had just brought the turn card. Seat 2 bet. Seat 5 called. While Seat 8 was pondering his decision, the dealer didn't notice that the action was incomplete and inadvertently dealt the river card. Immediately after the river was dealt Seat 8 folded his cards face down, but they did not hit the muck. The floor was called over and gave this ruling: shuffle the river card AND Seat 8's cards back into the deck and deal the river again. I have two questions:
1. Why shuffle the folded cards back into the deck? Doesn't this change the final probabilities?
2. Because Seat 8 folded face down, the play of the two remaining players was not affected, so why re-deal the river?
If Seat 8 had wanted to stay in and was just slow to call, I agree that you have to re-deal the river since his decision would be affected by whatever card was dealt. But in this case, it seems to me that the proper call was to muck Seat 8's cards, leave the river as dealt, and start the action with Seat 2.
Thanks for your help.
Bob Devaney
Portland, OR
rjamesd@mmode.com
For simplicity I will describe what happened as if seat 1 had the button. There were three players left (Seat 2, 5, and 8) and the dealer had just brought the turn card. Seat 2 bet. Seat 5 called. While Seat 8 was pondering his decision, the dealer didn't notice that the action was incomplete and inadvertently dealt the river card. Immediately after the river was dealt Seat 8 folded his cards face down, but they did not hit the muck. The floor was called over and gave this ruling: shuffle the river card AND Seat 8's cards back into the deck and deal the river again. I have two questions:
1. Why shuffle the folded cards back into the deck? Doesn't this change the final probabilities?
2. Because Seat 8 folded face down, the play of the two remaining players was not affected, so why re-deal the river?
If Seat 8 had wanted to stay in and was just slow to call, I agree that you have to re-deal the river since his decision would be affected by whatever card was dealt. But in this case, it seems to me that the proper call was to muck Seat 8's cards, leave the river as dealt, and start the action with Seat 2.
Thanks for your help.
Bob Devaney
Portland, OR
rjamesd@mmode.com