Jumping on the bragging bandwagon (20,717 hands, 3/6)

[nepenthe]

Total hands: 20,717
VP$IP: 21.01%
VP$IP from SB: 24.44%
SF All hands: 26.16%
SF Not a Blind: 20.43%
Folded SB to Steal: 82.88%
Folded BB to Steal: 74.65%
Fold BB to Steal HU: 72.94%
Att to Steal Blinds: 20.56%
Won $ When Saw Flop: 32.11%
BB/100 hands: (Prefer to refrain from sharing to encourage impartial analysis)
Went to Showdown: 35.58%
Won $ at SD: 52.13%
Raised PF: 7.29%

When Folds Hand:
No Fold: 13.69%
Flop: 8.95%
Turn: 2.77%
River: 1.58%

Folded to River Bet: 39.90%

Check Raises:
Flop: 44.66%
Turn: 45.31%
River: 10.03%

Aggression Factor:
Flop: 1.96
Turn: 2.35
River: 2.01
Total (excluding preflop): 2.11

[Sample Size Man]

I deem your sample size:

INSUFFICIENT

[sthief09]

you're pretty loose and too passive preflop. I don't see a reason why anyone's PFR should be less than half his VP$IP

[nepenthe]

Passive preflop that I am wholeheartly agree. It's something only recently that I rectifying began.

[sthief09]

you do know a lot of big words though...

[balkii]

I would:

steal more blinds
defend more blinds
raise more preflop
call less preflop

aggression factors numbers seem kind of meaningless but mine are drastically different from yours so i'll post them here:
flop 4.25
turn 3.76
river 2.29

so you might be missing some raises (or maybe i'm a lag)

[Lost Wages]

Agree with the others.

1) You are too loose
VP$IP is just too high. Went to SD is too high also. You just aren't going to hit the flop that often when you are loose preflop.

2) You are too passive.
Especially on the flop.

3) You are not stealing/defending enough.
This starts to become an issue at 3/6. At 2/4 and below you can practially ignore it and still do OK but at 3/6 you need to start working on it. Obviously, if someone knows that you will fold your BB to a steal headup 73% of the time the they would be correct to attempt a steal with any 2 cards.

Lost Wages

[MarkL444]

Does PT have an option to look at all your stats when a certain number of people are dealt in? Considering some people are willing to play shorthanded more than others their numbers will be much different.

[MAxx]

[ QUOTE ]
I deem your sample size:

INSUFFICIENT

[/ QUOTE ]


I get a kick out of sample size man, everytime I see his post. However, in this case where we are discussing things such as aggression and looseness as opposed to things such as BB/100:

I deem your post NOT RELEVANT

[sthief09]

ouch

[MAxx]

Several of my stats look very similar to yours, and according to Lost Wages, sthief, and Balkii- that's not a great place to be. I am tighter pf, with less VPIP. After reading prior posters comments... I am ashamed of my pf % percentage a little, but feel like a real wuss for my overall agression factor. My BB/100 is great, but sample size man would be correct to jump on me b/c my sample size is tiny.

What is the fastest way to copy your stats into the thread? It doesnt look like you can copy and paste directly from pokertracker white page detail. Can you export it to excel or word from pokertracker?

[sthief09]

I don't think there's a good way to import relavent stats to Excel so I think you gotta do it the old fashioned way and type it in manually.

[MAxx]

thanks for the info. what a shame.

[nepenthe]

balkii: You LAG. /images/graemlins/smile.gif
Lost Wages: Is the Went to SD% too high compared to the Won at SD%? Not sure how these are supposed to relate if at all.

Preflop seems to be my loosest and most passive street by far.

Stealing, me work on.

BTW, did everyone catch how this post was designed to be a semi-retaliation against those 300 hand sample / emphasis on 4BB/100 OMG look at me did i do g00t posts? /images/graemlins/crazy.gif