schwza
09-10-2004, 11:54 AM
i was just checking out two dimes (http://www.twodimes.net/poker/) to see how much i had the worst of it in a short-stack all-in confrontation. my K8 was a 34 - 66 dog against AT:
Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ts Ah 1120079 65.41 585148 34.17 7077 0.41 0.656
8s Kd 585148 34.17 1120079 65.41 7077 0.41 0.344
just checking out some hands, i was very surprised to see that i would have been (slightly) better off if i had had 58 instead of K8!
Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ts Ah 1113909 65.05 591026 34.52 7369 0.43 0.653
8s 5d 591026 34.52 1113909 65.05 7369 0.43 0.347
i thought i had been playing this game long enough to not be surprised about heads up pre-flop all-in numbers. anyone else surprised by this?
Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ts Ah 1120079 65.41 585148 34.17 7077 0.41 0.656
8s Kd 585148 34.17 1120079 65.41 7077 0.41 0.344
just checking out some hands, i was very surprised to see that i would have been (slightly) better off if i had had 58 instead of K8!
Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ts Ah 1113909 65.05 591026 34.52 7369 0.43 0.653
8s 5d 591026 34.52 1113909 65.05 7369 0.43 0.347
i thought i had been playing this game long enough to not be surprised about heads up pre-flop all-in numbers. anyone else surprised by this?