11-15-2001, 10:35 AM
I am a fair HE player, recently winning more than losing in the local 5-10. This house game also has O-8 on another night, and I understood that O-8 is a game where edges can be larger between solid players and the fish.
Of course, I was the fish. Went down quickly and steadily, and got up and left when my stack was cut in half. Not gonna throw good money after bad. Funny, but the game broke up right when I left with my fish buddy!
Anyway, based on my limited experience with Omaha I drew a few conclusions and wanted some input. Game to me seems like it's a lot more simple than HE, i.e. wait for a nut draw and simply hang in there to see if anyone outclassed ventures into the pot with you. That seems boring to me, and counter to the spirit of poker. (Will probably spark a great debate with that comment...)
The players did not become animated at all during hands, and simply released hands at flop, turn or river without drama. All so very calculating, no fancy plays at all. It was almost as if each player had calculated a precise number of outs at the deal, and simply hung in as long as the board was favorable.
I suppose my problem with O-8, aside from losing, was that it seems to be a game of playing your cards. HE involves playing your man almost as much as the cards to me. I see Omaha as a game where you decipher values of complex relationships. The patient calculating players get paid, the rest of us pay off. How dry.
I will continue to play O-8 on Turbo and learn. Next time in a public card room I'll give it a whirl again, but I can't see having much fun unless I'm winning mad loot.
Anyone care to make any Omaha metaphors or explain why they like the game?
Of course, I was the fish. Went down quickly and steadily, and got up and left when my stack was cut in half. Not gonna throw good money after bad. Funny, but the game broke up right when I left with my fish buddy!
Anyway, based on my limited experience with Omaha I drew a few conclusions and wanted some input. Game to me seems like it's a lot more simple than HE, i.e. wait for a nut draw and simply hang in there to see if anyone outclassed ventures into the pot with you. That seems boring to me, and counter to the spirit of poker. (Will probably spark a great debate with that comment...)
The players did not become animated at all during hands, and simply released hands at flop, turn or river without drama. All so very calculating, no fancy plays at all. It was almost as if each player had calculated a precise number of outs at the deal, and simply hung in as long as the board was favorable.
I suppose my problem with O-8, aside from losing, was that it seems to be a game of playing your cards. HE involves playing your man almost as much as the cards to me. I see Omaha as a game where you decipher values of complex relationships. The patient calculating players get paid, the rest of us pay off. How dry.
I will continue to play O-8 on Turbo and learn. Next time in a public card room I'll give it a whirl again, but I can't see having much fun unless I'm winning mad loot.
Anyone care to make any Omaha metaphors or explain why they like the game?