daiwiza
08-29-2004, 03:53 PM
Hi!
Have some questions concerning the Sit and go's 10+1$ at party.
When you play in this one table tournaments you obviously at least have to beat the rake to break even, and because you pay 1$ Rake every time you have to play 10% better to break even. But only for every percent, that you beat the game 10+ you will gain money in the long run.
My question is:
(1) Approx. for what percentage should a good player beat such NL-tourneys, and (2) for what percentage should he finish among the last three?
I already thank you for your answers.
Dai
Have some questions concerning the Sit and go's 10+1$ at party.
When you play in this one table tournaments you obviously at least have to beat the rake to break even, and because you pay 1$ Rake every time you have to play 10% better to break even. But only for every percent, that you beat the game 10+ you will gain money in the long run.
My question is:
(1) Approx. for what percentage should a good player beat such NL-tourneys, and (2) for what percentage should he finish among the last three?
I already thank you for your answers.
Dai