How relevant are the Olympics?

[ThaSaltCracka]

ANSWER!!!!!

[Dynasty]

About 5.8

[ThaSaltCracka]

on a 10 point scale? is that the east germans score?

[Dynasty]

No. I wasn't using a 10 point scale.

[ThaSaltCracka]

hmmmm.... I don't get it, a 6 point scale? 5.8 scale?

[Dynasty]

I'm not using any scale.

[ThaSaltCracka]

so you just tossed out an irrelavant number?

[Dynasty]

[ QUOTE ]
so you just tossed out an irrelavant number?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a bit rude. It's not an irrelevant number. You asked how relevant the Olympics are and I gave you my answer.

[ThaSaltCracka]

yeah but its not based upon any sort of scale, so what does 5.8 mean?

[tolbiny]

Salt-
are you taking your joking reply to a joking reply way to far, or are you just being a bit obtuse today?

[ThaSaltCracka]

maybe..... my initial question was serious though.
5.8.... that seems a bit irrelavent though.

[tolbiny]

"how relevent are the olympics"

"5.8.... that seems a bit irrelavent though."

/images/graemlins/grin.gif

[jdl22]

You're way off. I think it's about an 11.73

[tolbiny]

you should have rounded down to 11.7
the sig figures in this discussion make it irrelevant to go any further.

[Cyrus]

In the grand scheme of things, the Olympics are irrelevant.

...I have no idea what is the grand scheme of things, of course. (Or the little scheme.)

[Kurn, son of Mogh]

It depends

[HDPM]

clearly the most relevant was the womens shot put. It is at least a 10.42.

the least relevant was anything with judges. they are easily under 3.09.

Men's basketball was about a 4.498.

[Diplomat]

53-47, barely a favourate.

-Diplomat

[benfranklin]

The Olympics aren't until 2006. What's the rush?

[ThaSaltCracka]

bleh..... I mean how relavant can they be when the US kicks the [censored] out of everyone else.