PDA

View Full Version : Greenspan Warns on Baby Boomer Benefits


adios
08-27-2004, 11:35 AM
He's whistleing in the wind during the political "silly" season methinks. BTW one of the biggest issues in this presidential campaign that doesn't get discussed hardly at all IMO is the appointment of the next Fed chairman. It's basically a given that Greenie will step down in 2006 and thus the next president will have an opportunity to appoint the next Fed chairman. Greenie has been the Fed chairman since 1987 and prior to that Paul Volker started a new course in Fed monetary policy which Greenie more or less continued. A change in U.S. monetary policy could potentially have a huge economic impact in the U.S. This is one appointment that I don't feel at all comfortable about Kerry making. I have no idea where Kerry's thoughts run on a new Fed chairman but I strongly believe that Bush would appoint someone that more or less continued current monetary policy. Kerry may as well but I don't know.

Greenspan Warns on Baby Boomer Benefits (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=1&u=/ap/20040827/ap_on_bi_ge/greenspan)

Greenspan Warns on Baby Boomer Benefits

1 hour, 2 minutes ago Add Business - AP to My Yahoo!


By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer

JACKSON, Wyo. - Federal Reserve (news - web sites) Chairman Alan Greenspan (news - web sites) said Friday that the country will face "abrupt and painful" choices if Congress does not move quickly to trim the Social Security (news - web sites) and Medicare benefits that have been promised to the baby boom generation.

Returning to a politically explosive issue that he has addressed a number of times this year, Greenspan said that it was wrong for the government to hold out the promise of more retirement benefits than it is capable of providing.


He said this issue was particularly critical given the impending retirement of 77 million baby boomers born in the two decades after World War II.


"As a nation, we owe it to our retirees to promise only the benefits that can be delivered," Greenspan said in opening remarks to a two-day conference sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City on the challenges posed by aging populations.


"If we have promised more than our economy has the ability to deliver, as I fear we may have, we must recalibrate our public programs so that pending retirees have time to adjust through other channels," Greenspan said. "If we delay, the adjustments could be abrupt and painful."


Greenspan, as he has done previously, suggested that possible changes would be raising the retirement age to receive full Social Security benefits, which currently is gradually increasing from 65 to 67.


Greenspan, who is 78 and was recently confirmed for a fifth term as Fed chairman, has been a proponent of raising the retirement age ever since he was chairman of a commission that recommended a number of changes to rescue Social Security from impending insolvency two decades ago.


In his remarks, Greenspan said that the projected doubling of the U.S. population over the age of 65 by 2035 would add to the government's budget deficit woes.


But he said it was important to be careful in how those deficits were addressed. He said that relying entirely on an increase in the payroll tax on workers to deal with the funding shortfall in Social Security and Medicare would make it more costly for employers to hire workers.


Greenspan said policymakers must consider all the economic impacts that changes in the government's two biggest benefit programs would entail such as the effect on retirement decisions, the size of the labor force and the saving behavior of Americans.


Greenspan acknowledged that any decisions to trim benefits or boost payroll taxes could be difficult politically, but he said those decisions must be made and made quickly to give baby boomers time to adjust.


"Though the challenges of prospective increasingly stark choices for the United States seem great, the necessary adjustments will likely be smaller than those required in most other developing countries," he said, noting that Europe and Japan will have a much higher proportion of retirees to current workers in coming years.


Greenspan has repeatedly this year addressed the looming crisis in Social Security and Medicare, a development that the presidential candidates have chosen to virtually ignore given the painful choices that will likely be presented to the next president.

andyfox
08-27-2004, 02:00 PM
What happened to the trillions of dollars more that have been taken in in Social Security and Medicaire taxes than have been paid out in benefits? I wonder what our two presidential aspirants will have to say about that.

A guess: nothing.

cardcounter0
08-27-2004, 02:04 PM
Didn't the Treasury have too much money in it when Bush took office? Wasn't an immediate refund required?

Bush has run the country just like he has all his other business adventures. Have friends take over company and appoint him in charge. Pillage company coffers, stuff insiders pockets with cash. Bail out and leave average stockholders holding the bag.