PDA

View Full Version : Two $15-30 hands that bugged me


piguy24
08-27-2004, 12:41 AM
Both hands were Bellagio $15-30.
Hand 1: I'm on the button.
UTG calls, UTG+1 (very loose but very predictable postflop) calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, CO (decent player) raises, I look at 9 /images/graemlins/spade.gif9 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif and call, SB folds, all else call.
Flop: 9 /images/graemlins/club.gif8 /images/graemlins/heart.gif7 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
Checked to CO who bets, I raise, UTG+1 cold-calls, CO calls (everyone else folded).
Turn 6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif.
I bet, UTG+1 check-raises, CO folds, I call.
River 4 /images/graemlins/club.gif.
UTG+1 bets, I fold.
Anyone check the turn?

Hand 2: I'm in the CO.
MP1 (weak-tight when acting before the raiser but loose-aggressive after) limps in MP1, I raise with K /images/graemlins/heart.gif9 /images/graemlins/heart.gif. SB, BB, and MP1 call.
Flop A /images/graemlins/heart.gif7 /images/graemlins/heart.gif4 /images/graemlins/heart.gif
SB checks, BB checks, MP1 bets, I call, SB and BB fold.
Turn 6 /images/graemlins/heart.gif.
MP1 bets, I raise, MP1 thinks for a while, shows Q /images/graemlins/heart.gifT /images/graemlins/heart.gif and folds.
Should I have waited to the river to raise?

sweetzer
08-27-2004, 01:37 AM
Hand #1: bet the turn, call the river.

Hand #2: raise the turn, make him pay with two pair or a set. You are more likely to get action on this street. How he folded the made 2nd nut flush for one bet is unfathomable.

bbooze
08-27-2004, 02:58 AM
Can I ask why you raised preflop in hand two? Is the suited sawmill now a playable hand? 6-7 handed I could see it, maybe... but was this a 10 handed table? Your read was important obviously... but still.

As far as the first hand, I think I would have payed the river just to see what card alongside his T he's holding (and of course once in a while you'll win). Hand two I don't see how you could have played it better, and he's a better man than I for folding.

IlliniRyRy
08-27-2004, 10:32 AM
[ QUOTE ]
How he folded the made 2nd nut flush for one bet is unfathomable.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah that laydown would be made 1 out of 5000 times probably. That guy is sick tight, you played it fine.

SpaceAce
08-27-2004, 11:06 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Can I ask why you raised preflop in hand two? Is the suited sawmill now a playable hand? 6-7 handed I could see it, maybe... but was this a 10 handed table? Your read was important obviously... but still.

[/ QUOTE ]

One limper, everyone else folds and the hero is in the cutoff. Why wouldn't he raise this? K9s is too good to just throw away with only one limper and a chance to buy the button and knock out one or both blinds, at least if you play as well or better post-flop than the other players.

SpaceAce

surfdoc
08-27-2004, 11:31 AM
Hand2: That is about the sickest laydown ever.

piguy24
08-27-2004, 01:12 PM
Yeah, I couldn't believe the lady laid down the 2nd nut flush, especially after seeing her make two calldowns with marginal hands against a rock who had her crushed both times.
The first hand is a situation where I almost always call but feel that I almost always lose. Although the pot was big, the guy in question was so predictable that I thought there was no way he could've had anything but a straight. He was nice enough to show me the straight, and I was able to sleep that night.

andyfox
08-27-2004, 02:35 PM
First hand: I'd have 3-bet pre-flop. I stand to lose a blind or two and a limper or two or three. And they'll probably check to me on the flop. That's a lot of stuff for the cost of one small bet. On the turn, I'd check because who's gonna call with a worse hand given that board? Plus I'm not scared of a free card. Plus it may induce a bluff on the river.

Second hand I raise the turn too. Since he limped in from early position, I've got to figure him for a high heart and also figure he's going to call me down. Shows what I know.

tom
08-27-2004, 03:48 PM
I am a newbie, but my 2 cents:

Hand 1:

raise flop as u did, check turn (better hand will check raise, worse hand would probably fold). call river unless extremely good read tells u to fold.

Hand 2:

Raise with K9? Anyway, since you did, i think either raise on flop or call on turn is better than raise on turn. the MP1 makes a extremely good laydown, but if mp1 didnt have exactly qth or qjh, what does mp1 bet with, then call a raise (since mp1 didnt raise preflop?

ike
08-27-2004, 07:18 PM
You messed up but you figured out what you did. Hand one, yes check the turn. Hand two, yes raise the river.

ike
08-27-2004, 07:20 PM
If you figure him for a high heart what do you lose by waiting for the river to raise?

cuse
08-27-2004, 11:54 PM
One play I'd certainly consider in hand two is simply raising the flop. When you say that MP1 is "weak-tight when acting before the raiser," I would assume that this flop bet is indicitive of some sort of a monster. If the blinds are aware of the MP's play I think calling hoping for overcalls is not nearly as profitable as raising and expecting a three-bet from MP1 which will allow you to cap. With this play, I would expect that you would still be able to get at least one BB on the turn or river from MP1 regardless of whether or not a heart hits- if the heart hits you can check through behind on the turn, inducing a river bluff, and otherwise bet the turn and expect a sure call. This play is very dependant on the belief that MP1's hand is strong enough that that player is betting into you, the preflop raiser, with the intention of three-betting.

I think it is unlikely that your smooth-call will convince the blinds to participate past the turn, and on the off chance that one of them has a hand capable of calling your raise, this play is even better.

On the other hand, if your weak-tight comment just means that you're worried about a fold to your raise or that three-betting is unlikely, then I like smooth-calling the flop and waiting for the river for your raise.

andyfox
08-28-2004, 12:17 AM
Lots of guys in my game figure a river raise after you've bet twice is apt to mean the nuts, whereas a turn raise can be posturing. They'll even 3-bet the turn with the 2nd nuts, whereas they might fold on the river.

Michael Davis
08-28-2004, 02:18 AM
A lot. His opponent may give up when he misses the river and definitely cannot pay off a raise even if she bluffs. And on the few occasions like the one in which his opponent had the hand she did (second nuts), he is more likely to get into a raising war on the turn than on the river.

-Michael

Michael Davis
08-28-2004, 02:20 AM
Preflop, raising the K9s here against an opponent fitting the description is the best play. There really isn't another option. You have a good chance of isolating an opponent with a worse hand, but also have a hand that can stand the other players coming along.

-Michael

Michael Davis
08-28-2004, 02:22 AM
I agree with you. I like to raise the flop here, too. Everybody expects you to, anyways. And there's no way your opponents are giving you credit for this hand when you play it speedily.

-Michael

DcifrThs
08-28-2004, 03:57 AM
you happened to post two hands that are straight math.

in hand one you say the early guy is "predictable postflop" therefore he has precisely a ten in his hand or the made straight when he calls the two cold from you. therefore you get to see the river for free when its checked to you and you check behind which is what you should have done. if you bet, you will almost always have to call the bet and this is a corollary to S&M's check with outs, bet without if you can fold to the raise. this is especially so because you are 100% guaranteed a free river since you're last to act vs. haveing to pay TWO bets for the same free river. you could have spent 1/2 of what you had to and called instead of folding the river. what did he look like when the turn hit (gotta watch people) ? where were his hands? near his chips? if any of these tells was there you gotta check, even anticipation in his eyes and wrists...personally since he PLAYS PREDICTABLY you know he has the draw and the T is the most likely end of it so i check behind.

HAND 2:

in this hand the relative value of your hand does not change at all so raising the turn gets all other flushes to fold so often that you need to guarantee yourself at the very least that 1 extra bet on the river. that turn raise is too strong and you end up costing yourself more than you'll ever make with that raise.

-Barron

DcifrThs
08-28-2004, 03:58 AM
[ QUOTE ]
If you figure him for a high heart what do you lose by waiting for the river to raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

bingo...straight math as i said in my post.

-Barron

DcifrThs
08-28-2004, 04:01 AM
micheal and andy,

i tend to agree with ike here given the description of the player. you'll gain that extra bet more often that you'll ever get 3 bet ... there's just too high a probability you'll gain 1 bet after he folds to the river raise rather than gain an extra one or 2 on the turn...i think you're giving him too little weak tight credit.

-Barron

Lawrence Ng
08-28-2004, 04:09 AM
I think you played both hands fine.

piguy24
08-28-2004, 04:31 AM
Cuse, I like your line of thinking. In the 2nd hand, I definitely wasn't thinking that MP1 had a flush, which was stupid because I knew for her to bet into a raiser she needed a great hand. I was thinking a set since it was unlikely that we both flopped flushed, which is why I raised the turn. But I agree that a flop raise would've gotten some extra bets out of her.