B00T
08-10-2004, 09:47 AM
I usually 4 table and never really felt too comfortable in the NL atmosphere. I was pulling in about $11/hr playing 4 NL $25's. Not a great winrate but still in the green nontheless. I decided to just move over to $1/$2 limit 4 tabling and found a decent size increase to about $17/hr or 2.2BB/100. I felt that I was unable to make decisions based on my opponents in NL, and missed out on chronic bluffers.
My question is this...
In your experiences (when multi-tabling, and just watching TV or doing other things not paying full attention), do you feel that it is more or less important to have player reads in Limit or No Limit? I guess I just feel more comfortable in not potentially risking my whole stack in one unreadable action by my opponent, as opposed to playing more textbook in limit. Obviously, I am talking about microlimit games. I feel up to 3-6 in limit and the NL $50's is the maximum where player reads are insignificant.
Anyone care to offer their opinion?
My question is this...
In your experiences (when multi-tabling, and just watching TV or doing other things not paying full attention), do you feel that it is more or less important to have player reads in Limit or No Limit? I guess I just feel more comfortable in not potentially risking my whole stack in one unreadable action by my opponent, as opposed to playing more textbook in limit. Obviously, I am talking about microlimit games. I feel up to 3-6 in limit and the NL $50's is the maximum where player reads are insignificant.
Anyone care to offer their opinion?