05-16-2002, 12:44 AM
30/60. I raise UTG with Qh Qd. The two really bad players at the table call me, one in LP and the other in SB.
Flop: Kc 7c 4d . I bet, LP calls and the SB folds. LP is capable of calling me here with any pair, ace high, and god only knows what else. He is very aggressive, though, so I think that a pair of kings is unlikey.
Turn: As . I bet and he calls. Was this a bad bet? I think that going into check-call mode may be the best play, because he is a pretty big bluffer, and I'm in a really bad spot if he raises. What do you think? The justification for betting is that he will call with many weaker hands than mine, and I think I'm ahead, but I still think checking is the better play.
River: 7h . I check, he bets, and I call. My queens beat his Jc8c.
The play that really concerns me is the turn bet. Do you think that it was a bad bet even though he is extremely loose? The fact that he is an aggressive bluffer is why I think checking is the better play, but what do you think?
-Dan
Flop: Kc 7c 4d . I bet, LP calls and the SB folds. LP is capable of calling me here with any pair, ace high, and god only knows what else. He is very aggressive, though, so I think that a pair of kings is unlikey.
Turn: As . I bet and he calls. Was this a bad bet? I think that going into check-call mode may be the best play, because he is a pretty big bluffer, and I'm in a really bad spot if he raises. What do you think? The justification for betting is that he will call with many weaker hands than mine, and I think I'm ahead, but I still think checking is the better play.
River: 7h . I check, he bets, and I call. My queens beat his Jc8c.
The play that really concerns me is the turn bet. Do you think that it was a bad bet even though he is extremely loose? The fact that he is an aggressive bluffer is why I think checking is the better play, but what do you think?
-Dan