Macedon
08-02-2004, 05:05 PM
Imagine the following scenario:
/images/graemlins/spade.gifYou are sitting at a table that is categorized as typical (not too tight or loose, nor too aggressive or passive).
/images/graemlins/diamond.gifIt is a no-limit game with the blinds at $2 and $4.
/images/graemlins/heart.gifYou are UTG and you get dealt pocket Aces.
/images/graemlins/club.gifSince you are not feeling like pulling any fancy moves, you decide to Limp-Raise with your pocket aces.
Everyone folds except for the Button who raises it up $12.
The blinds fold.
It is now up to you?
What should you do?
Now if you follow the Limp-Reraise plan, then the decision is a no-brainer. You gave your opponent the opportunity to put money into the pot and now you should raise it up so as to get them to commit some more (or fold).
If they have a made hand (pocket 10's through Kings) they might invest MORE money in the pot. If they are playing a drawing hand, they would no longer have the correct odds to play and will most likely release their hand. If they put you on a bluff, you just might take down the biggest pot of the game.
So Limp-Reraising is the most obvious play for a person holding A-A in early position.
However, your goal is always to win the most amount of money possible, and not necessarily to rush a monster hand against a POSSIBLY weak opponent.
A late position raise could mean many things, but all too often it is an effort by a player to pick up a pot uncontested. Your opponent on the button could be playing any two cards. He/She could be holding a made hand, a drawing hand, or jack shiat. A button raise could mean weakness.
Knowing this, wouldn't it be smarter to slowplay your aces (heads-up) against a button raise? Wouldn't it be smarter to call the raise rather than re-raise? Isn't the obvious play (limp-reraising) lessen the chances of you taking down a much bigger pot? Isn't the real risk that you chase out a potentially weak player who would possibly release more chips on later stages (turn/river?)?
Any thoughts?
/images/graemlins/spade.gifYou are sitting at a table that is categorized as typical (not too tight or loose, nor too aggressive or passive).
/images/graemlins/diamond.gifIt is a no-limit game with the blinds at $2 and $4.
/images/graemlins/heart.gifYou are UTG and you get dealt pocket Aces.
/images/graemlins/club.gifSince you are not feeling like pulling any fancy moves, you decide to Limp-Raise with your pocket aces.
Everyone folds except for the Button who raises it up $12.
The blinds fold.
It is now up to you?
What should you do?
Now if you follow the Limp-Reraise plan, then the decision is a no-brainer. You gave your opponent the opportunity to put money into the pot and now you should raise it up so as to get them to commit some more (or fold).
If they have a made hand (pocket 10's through Kings) they might invest MORE money in the pot. If they are playing a drawing hand, they would no longer have the correct odds to play and will most likely release their hand. If they put you on a bluff, you just might take down the biggest pot of the game.
So Limp-Reraising is the most obvious play for a person holding A-A in early position.
However, your goal is always to win the most amount of money possible, and not necessarily to rush a monster hand against a POSSIBLY weak opponent.
A late position raise could mean many things, but all too often it is an effort by a player to pick up a pot uncontested. Your opponent on the button could be playing any two cards. He/She could be holding a made hand, a drawing hand, or jack shiat. A button raise could mean weakness.
Knowing this, wouldn't it be smarter to slowplay your aces (heads-up) against a button raise? Wouldn't it be smarter to call the raise rather than re-raise? Isn't the obvious play (limp-reraising) lessen the chances of you taking down a much bigger pot? Isn't the real risk that you chase out a potentially weak player who would possibly release more chips on later stages (turn/river?)?
Any thoughts?