who posts the best poker content ?

[knifeandfork]

clark, snake, dynasty, mike, bruiser(jk) not including red letter stars. i would vote for snakehead he once said he found "less and less reasons to tip" or something like that so its hard to cast my lot with him. might help a little fishie like me sort thru the bs easier feel free to vote for your self......... vote #1 goes to SH tips or not he is interesting and to the point ususally i dunno just gettin da party started

[Sarge85]

1st - Ed Miller
2nd - Clark
3rd - Dynasty
4th - Joe Tall
5th - Guy On Tilt

Sarge/images/graemlins/diamond.gif

[Sponger15SB]

El Diablo for NL.

[lowroller]

Ole!

[mikeyvegas]

[ QUOTE ]
Ole!

[/ QUOTE ]
No, its ¡Olé!

[thirddan]

add Nottom to the list, he helped me through the micros...

[lowroller]

I don't know, nor do I care to know, how to put the accent over the 'e' and invert the exclamation point.

You knew what I meant.

[EWillers]

good content must be readable

elysium is tops

[MicroBob]

bobt and homer have some pretty good stuff as well.

[TylerD]

Some others...Matt Flynn, Big Dave D and Buzz (easily the MVP of the Other Poker forum).

[Rushmore]

It's Clark.

and knifeandfork, i always enjoy elysium's posts as well, knifeandfork. do you see that it simply must be so?

[Homer]

I hate threads like this, and here's why...

- It's pretty easy to tell which of the regulars knows his/her stuff and which don't.

- There are a lot of infrequent posters who give amazing advice. To skip over their stuff just because you don't recognize the name would be foolish.

- Many posters' games improve over time and as such their quality of advice gradually improves as well, so they shouldn't be permanently cast aside.

- It takes away some of what makes the forum great. If you ignore all of the non-expert posters, you will lose a lot of the discussion that can ensue. Read posts that you suspect you might not agree with, and respond with why you think that poster is wrong. Some of the best conversations on the forum have come about from such situations.

- Posters who are mentioned may get swelled heads and those not mentioned may feel they are not valued and as such will stop posting.

- These threads always degrade into: "You're great"..."No way man, you're great"..."Let's just agree that we're both great"..."Yeah, we rule"

-- Homer

EDIT - Okay, fine, I will say one thing. JR is the Rafael Palmeiro of the Small Stakes forum.

[Kurn, son of Mogh]

I can't believe nobody mentioned Fossilman.

[nicky g]

Who he? /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

[SpiderMnkE]

Flossmilwho? /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[knifeandfork]

sorry homer my bad. i forgot about elysium he is hilarious. what i do is i search to see what clark, etc are talking about then back track and read the thread so it helps me to know who to search for im also not very good with the mssg board format i think i waste alot of time by not knowing the most efficient route to the desired information. it wasnt my intention to make anyone feel left out or unappreciated. sorry. btw i am biased but i dont think ed miller is that great of an advisor.

[bwana devil]

bwana devil is an absolute genius. I have never met a smarter, more handsome person. Bet your mortgage on whatever he tells you.

bwana devil

[Chris Daddy Cool]

hey homer,

you don't post as much as you used to in the micros and ss. that's a shame cuz you give good advice.

[SossMan]

From the MTT forum:

Cferejohn
Tosh
Kurn, son of sam
Che
Fnurt
MLG
Greg Raymer

[lowroller]

I agree...Homer's posts are solid as they come. I always enjoyed them.