PDA

View Full Version : What are they so afraid of?


sameoldsht
07-20-2004, 04:01 PM
Sandy Berger, former National Security Advisor for the Clinton administration, stole classified documents regarding the Clinton admins handling of Al Qaeda terror threats during the December 1999 millennium celebration by shoving them down his pants and into his socks? Classic stuff. Sort of reminds me of Hillary's Rose Law Firm document scandal.

Some great questions here by Hastert:
STORY (http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=134-07202004)

WASHINGTON, July 20 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Today, House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) released the following statement regarding allegations that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger removed highly classified terrorism documents and handwritten notes from a secure reading room during preparations for the 9/11 Commission hearings:

"I am profoundly troubled by allegations that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger removed highly classified documents from the National Archives regarding the Clinton Administration's handling of terrorist attacks prior to the September 11th attacks.

"What could those documents have said that drove Mr. Berger to remove them without authorization from a secure reading room for classified documents?

"What information could be so embarrassing that a man with decades of experience in handling classified documents would risk being caught pilfering our nation's most sensitive secrets?

"Did these documents detail simple negligence or did they contain something more sinister? Was this a bungled attempt to rewrite history and keep critical information from the 9/11 Commission and potentially put their report under a cloud?

"It is my understanding that Mr. Berger shoved this classified information into his clothing to smuggle them out of the National Archives. Press reports indicate that Archival staff became concerned when documents began to disappear and specifically marked additional documents to track them. A number of those documents also turned up missing.

"Mr. Berger has a lot of explaining to do. He was given access to these documents to assist the 9/11 Commission, not hide information from them. The American people and the 9/11 families don't want cover-ups when it comes to the War on Terror. They want the truth. And so does the U.S. House of Representatives."

elwoodblues
07-20-2004, 04:05 PM
This whole story is really strange. From everything I've heard, Berger only took COPIES of the documents, not the documents themselves. The question then becomes, why? It couldn't have been to cover anything up --- because the originals still existed. I guess it could be so that he could prep himself before testifying before the commission (doubtful). It could be that he took the documents to leak them to the press (I haven't seen anything leaked, though this makes some sense). Any other ideas?

cardcounter0
07-20-2004, 04:08 PM
Could they have contained parts of what Cheney spoke about with Ken Lay in his secret Energy Policy meetings?
/images/graemlins/grin.gif

sameoldsht
07-20-2004, 09:09 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Could they have contained parts of what Cheney spoke about with Ken Lay in his secret Energy Policy meetings?


[/ QUOTE ]

No.